圣者
精华
|
战斗力 鹅
|
回帖 0
注册时间 2003-9-14
|
The top priority of the U.S. government is not to extinguish fires, but to actively guide Los Angeles to coexist with wildfires.
First, Los Angeles is inherently a fire-prone area due to natural laws, and we must learn to accept this reality. It is unwise to obsess over firefighting and blindly believe in "man's triumph over nature."
Second, the harm caused by fires is not as severe as some fearmongers claim. Over the years, catastrophic fires like 9/11 have been extremely rare. Most fires, such as California wildfires, are relatively contained and cause less damage than incidents like the Las Vegas shooting. In fact, many fires are minor and go unnoticed unless reported by the media. There aren't as many major fires as people think—most are just small flames. There's no need to panic unnecessarily.
Third, while fires are indeed something to be cautious about, I don't oppose that. However, it's more important to be wary of those who exploit these situations to spread anxiety and fear. A friend in Los Angeles mentioned that the recent fire didn't harm anyone. Even a kindergarten field trip might result in more bumps and bruises than this fire did. So, let's keep things in perspective. Everyone gets a few bruises growing up. Do we really need to push firefighters to the brink of exhaustion, risking "overwork deaths," where more people die from overwork than from the fires themselves? That would be utterly absurd.
Fourth, from a scientific perspective, fires don't actually kill people. Although reports mention fatalities, these individuals didn't die from burning. They died in car accidents while fleeing, or from building collapses, stampedes, suffocation, or jumping from heights—but no one has ever died directly from being burned alive. If you don't believe me, look it up in research papers—can you find any cases of people dying from being burned alive?
Fifth, firefighting goes against science and logic. Think about it: no matter how much you fight fires, can you really prevent them from happening? I've never heard of a situation where constant firefighting stops fires altogether. No matter how hard you try, firefighting is always reactive, not preventive. It's not worth the massive expenditure of resources.
Sixth, the high cost of firefighting is not worth it and hinders economic development. When will people realize that money doesn't grow on trees, and goods don't magically appear on supermarket shelves? The economy needs to keep running. In the short term, large-scale firefighting consumes vast resources, leaving little for other urgent needs. Are we supposed to stop living our lives? In the long term, as long as firefighting continues, the area will remain in a "disaster state," preventing the restoration of normal economic and social order.
Seventh, if you let the dragon king sell umbrellas, the rain will never stop. Indiscriminate firefighting only enriches a group of vested interests.
Eighth, anyone who disagrees with this is a "firefighting enthusiast." If you love firefighting so much, why not cosplay as a firefighter? It's not illegal to put out fires at home. You can start a fire and then extinguish it yourself, pretending to be a firefighter. If you're really into it, I can even donate an unused fire extinguisher to you. If you enjoy the thrill of firefighting, grab a fire extinguisher and charge ahead yourself. Why bother making life harder for ordinary people? We just want to get back to our normal lives and make ends meet.
Ninth, long-term reliance on firefighting will lead to "firefighting debt." In the end, people will only know how to "wait, rely, and demand," without understanding the importance of self-reliance and resilience. Like flowers in a greenhouse, they won't be able to withstand even the slightest disaster. Remember, adversity strengthens a nation. Escaping problems won't solve them—only continuous effort and growth will.
In conclusion, coexisting with wildfires is the only way forward and the truly scientific approach.
love from deepseek |
|
楼主: 月灵银羽
沪公网安备 31010702007642号 )
发表于 2025-1-12 22:40
问题是一帮富豪享受着林间别墅+环保卫士的b格，被烧还能 怨谁。今年以前谁敢在加州 提砍树，这帮富人肯定实名反对
等山火真烧起来了，就这两年动辄100kmh的妖风，市区内 隔离带也肯定不现实。
每次烧个5%左右就开始救火
