婆罗门
精华
|
战斗力 鹅
|
回帖 0
注册时间 2011-10-10
|
本帖最后由 cube 于 2023-8-25 13:03 编辑
你这还是把IAEA理解为有实权的政府部门。
你不如看看IAEA自己为了不担责给这个报告和后续擦屁股叠了多少甲。
这个报告的原文就挂在IAEA的网站上，开篇就是
“This is a report by the IAEA of the IAEA Review of Safety Related Aspects of Handling ALPS-Treated Water at TEPCO’s Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station. The views expressed herein do not necessarily reflect those of IAEA Member States. Although great care has been taken to maintain the accuracy of information contained in this report, neither the IAEA nor its Member States assume any responsibility for consequences which may arise from its use. The use of particular designations of countries or territories does not imply any judgement by the IAEA, as to the legal status of such countries or territories, of their authorities and institutions or of the delimitation of their boundaries. The mention of names of specific companies or products (whether or not indicated as registered) does not imply any intention to infringe proprietary rights, nor should it be construed as an endorsement or recommendation on the part of the IAEA. The IAEA assumes no responsibility for the accuracy or continuing existence of URLs for external or third party internet web sites referred to in this report and does not guarantee that any content on such web sites is, or will remain, accurate or appropriate.”
一个参与专家不负责，组织成员国也不能拿来当学术和政策依据的报告，就差明说了是日本政府买的了，有个屁的“权威”。
|
|
楼主: 与太郎
沪公网安备 31010702007642号 )
发表于 2023-8-24 18:43
