电车
精华
|
战斗力 鹅
|
回帖 0
注册时间 2018-6-26
|
本帖最后由 流食泥潭 于 2021-11-24 02:07 编辑
用频响曲线工具之前先看过再说吧。同时还听了别的,喜欢1300ss多过1697。
1. A Frequency Response graph is not in any way an indication of good sound quality. Think of it as flavours, like in ice-cream. The FR is like the branding at the side of the tub telling you the flavour of the ice cream. It’s not going to tell you if it’s good ice cream, but at least you have a way of finding out if it’s the flavour you want. 4. Measurements are meant to complement subjective impressions, not form the basis for them. I get that certain people like to paint me as some sort of objectivehead figure where all I do is look at graphs and determine quality sorely off of said metrics. 99% of the IEMs I’ve measured, I have listened to as well. If not for the graphs, one can also take this database as a list of IEMs I’ve tried and auditioned, and the graphs simply being proof of it. 说Acoustune就顺便搜了下,1697和1695ti曲线几乎一模一样,但是他网站的评级表一个是A-一个是B,怎么回事呢 |
|